Nearly every season, at least a couple of teams don't field a top-50 fantasy WR. It's happened in 16 of the last 18 seasons. My spreadsheet goes back to 1998. In those first 14 seasons (1998-2011), 7% of teams (2.25 on average) don't have a top-50 WR. In the next 14 seasons (2012-2025), it's the same percentage. In other words, this isn't tied to a fantasy era. It's fairly predictable.
For context, last year's overall WR51 was Jerry Jeudy, who netted only 7.1 points per game. He led all Browns fantasy wideouts. He cleared 12 points only twice. He was essentially unstartable.
Also since 1998, roughly five teams per year don't have a top-40 fantasy WR. This averages out to about 15% per year. Interestingly, 15% of teams fell short in the 1998-2011 timeframe, and 15% also fell short in the 2012-2025 period. So once again, this is consistent across mini-eras.
Not having a top-40 WR on a given team means not having a reliable streamer. Or you might have a streamer who plays 13 games and misses the fantasy playoffs. George Pickens (WR42) led all Pittsburgh wideouts in 2024. He had six single-digit performances and missed Weeks 14, 15, and 16 -- most of the fantasy playoffs. In other words, he was somewhere between unstartable and mostly unstreamable in more than half of his team's games.
Each summer, I try to predict which (roughly) five teams are most likely not to have a top-40 WR, and which (roughly) two teams are most likely not to have a top-50 WR. It's based partly on QB quality / injury risk (as well as who's the #2 QB). It's also based on WR depth; if the alpha receiver gets hurt, is there enough remaining talent to ensure someone remains fantasy-relevant?
I recently added a new feature, "Team-by-Team ADPs," to my top-350 fantasy rankings (sign-up link below). This is a quick-and-easy way to scan each team's player ADPs to see where there might be actionable information. For example, the Browns don't have a WR in the ADP top-50. I agree with the market's assessment. So not much else to say.
The Raiders' best WR ADP is Jalen Nailor's (60). Tre Tucker is at 64, with Jack Bech (103), D'onte Thornton, and intriguing rookie Malik Benson (134) way back. I see value here. Despite what should be a top-heavy offense led by Ashton Jeanty and Brock Bowers, Vegas has a ton of youth among its playmakers. While a top-40 finish seems marginally unlikely, I think Tucker, Bech, Thornton, or Benson will finish in the top 50, and that in the next few weeks we'll be able to narrow that down to about two guys.
The Dolphins are a mess, with their best wideout coming in at WR79 (Malik Washington). Three rookies, two journeymen, and Washington will battle it out for Best-Ball relevance. While someone could rise to the top, I still don't trust Malik Willis to elevate them. Miami looks like it will miss out on a top-50 WR.
If the averages of the past 28 seasons hold for another year, we need to find a couple more non-top-40 candidates. I believe the most likely options (if things break a certain way) include the Commanders, Steelers, Chiefs, and Bills. In Washington, Terry McLaurin will turn 31 in September. If the team adds someone like Stefon Diggs, could Jayden Daniels feed both of them enough to push one inside the top 40 -- with the understanding that both guys seemingly are post-prime?
Pittsburgh has an Aaron Rodgers issue, in that the aged QB threw heavily last year to his running backs and tight ends. D.K. Metcalf managed to finish as the WR26. No other Steeler was inside the top 70. The addition of Michael Pittman Jr. means both starting wideouts are risky bets to post top-35 numbers, and that makes them fringe top-40 options.
For the Chiefs, it comes down to Rashee Rice's off-the-field issues. A suspension is still on the table. If Rice once again misses a lot of time, Xavier Worthy hasn't shown he can be a weekly streamer in Rice's absence, and no one else seems poised to step up (though WR Cyrus Allen is one of my favorite "no-one-is-drafting-him" rookies).
Finally, the fantasy market believes D.J. Moore (WR26 ADP) will be just fine on his new team. But Buffalo has a lot of receiving options, with Khalil Shakir, Keon Coleman, and rookie Skyler Bell looming as ceiling cappers, as well as a mostly effective TE tandem and a near-elite RB (and potentially strong RB handcuff). These past two seasons, this team hasn't had a top-35 WR. It's not farfetched to think that if Moore is a descending talent, the Bills might not have a top-40 receiver.
If we can anticipate which WR corps are most at risk, we might factor that into our rankings. It's hard, but not impossible. Last season the Browns, Jets, and Titans were the only teams not to have a top-40 (or even top-50) fantasy WR. If someone last summer had told you that would happen, would you have been surprised? Cleveland had major quarterback issues. the Jets were relying on a low-pass-volume QB who'd been let go by two teams in the previous two years. Tennessee had a "great" rookie quarterback throwing to three aged starting wideouts backed by three Day 3 rookies.
And yet, entering Week 1, Jerry Jeudy's ADP was WR33, Garrett Wilson's was WR17, and Calvin Ridley's was WR28. Again, this doesn't mean it was highly predictable. But by *knowing* the probability that "x" number of WR corps will fall short, we can play those probabilities to our advantage.
---
* Sign up for FF4W Top 350 Preseason Fantasy Rankings (donate what you want):
(1) Venmo -- venmo.com/u/ff4winners
(2) Cash App -- cash.app/$ff4winners
(3) PayPal -- paypal.me/bjrudell
* Today's FF4W podcast, episode 205: "Unbrilliance" -- podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/fantasy-football-for-winners/id1800490745
* Download FF4W research: www.fantasyfootballforwinners.com/p/research_1.html